Southern Arizona Writing Project Logo

for teachers
for administrators
for graduate students
for sawp teacher consultants

invitational summer institute
inservice teacher training
writing community saturdays
teacher research & inquiry
writing resources on the web
student writers
Composed, newsletter archives

[site map]

national writing assessments

Download as PDF document

The 1998 NAEP report linked students performances in grades four, eight, twelve to various home and school practices.  Students who outperformed their peers planned (were asked to plan writing once a week or twice a month), and wrote multiple drafts (no relationships in grade 4 but in grades 8 and 12, more than one draft yielded higher scores).  In addition, these teacher practices support higher scores in writing:  teacher-student discussion (students in grades 8 and 12 outperformed their peers when their teachers always spoke to them about their writing), and portfolios (students who saved their work over time had higher writing scores in all three grades).

Effective Writing Assignments.  Effective writing assignments encourage student engagement with writing processes in ways that go beyond formulaic use of prewriting, drafting, and revision.  They use and balance four key elements:

  • Content and Scope (do more than write about what you have read or experienced - students should reflect, analyze, and synthesize).
  • Organization and Development (give students a framework for developing ideas and organizational guidelines).
  • Audience and Communication (goes beyond "pretend" audience and gives students genuine opportunities to communicate to real audiences).
  • Engagement and Choice (avoids pitfalls of offering students too much choice or none at all by restricting range of decisions the student is asked to make as a way to engage her more in the assignment).

Greenwald, E.A., Persky, H.R., Campbell, J.R., and Mazzeo, J.  NAEP 1998 Writing Report Card for the Nation and the States. (NCES 1999-462). Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education, 1999.

National Writing Project Classroom Practices. NWP Teachers spend far more time on writing instruction than most fourth-grade teachers across the country.  On average, NWP classroom teachers spend 6.5 hours per week on writing activities.  Nationally, only 3 percent of their peers spent three or more hours per week on them.  Additionally, there was tremendous breadth of writing activities (of 45 assignments analyzed, 19 involved expository tasks, 10 were personal or family narratives, 8 were creative writing, 5 were poetry assignments, and 4 included persuasive writing); writing strategies also varied and were practiced daily [pair or group work (87%); peer editing (69%); completing multiple drafts (84%); and conferencing with students (78%)].

Academy for Educational Development. National Writing Project Evaluation: NWP Classrooms: Strategies, Assignments, and Student Work. Year One Results. New York: Academy for Educational Development, 2001, pp. 31, 36.

Professional Development. Anthony Alvarado began an 8-year tenure as superintendent in New York City in 1987, an ethnically and economically diverse district (50% of students below the poverty line).  At this time his district ranked 10th in reading  and 4th in math out of 32 subdistricts in NYC. By 1996, this district ranked 2nd in reading and mathematics.  Here are Alvarado's strategies for systemic change:

  1. It's about instruction.and only about instruction.
  2. Instructional change is a long, multi-stage process.
  3. Shared expertise is the driver of instructional change.
  4. Focus on system-wide improvement.
  5. Good ideas come from talented people working together.
  6. Set clear expectations, then decentralize.
  7. Collegiality, caring and respect.

R. F. Elmore. Investing in Teacher Learning: Staff Development and Instructional Improvement in Community School District #2, New York City.  New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future, Aug. 1997, pp. 8-13. 

Time and Money and Professional Development. The National Staff Development Council (NSDC) urges that at least 25 percent of teachers' time should be given over to improving their expertise and to collaboration with colleagues. Endorsing this figure, the National Association of Elementary School Principals also concurs with NSCD's recommendation that, ideally, 5-10 percent of the school budget should be allotted to professional development opportunities for teachers and instructional staff.

National Association of Elementary School Principals. Leading Learning Communities: NAESP Standards for What Principals Should Know and Be Able to Do. Alexandria, VA.: National Association of Elementary School Principals, 2001, p.42.

National Writing Project: Teachers Teaching Teachers. Founded in 1974, the NWP focuses on improving writing and learning in our nation's schools, putting teacher expertise and networks at the heart of its professional development model.  This professional network links 180 college-based sites in fifty states.  They have sponsored more than 5500 professional development programs in 2001 alone, including 3000 in-service workshops for teachers, one third of which were partnerships with schools.  Two key features of NWP's approach to teacher development: "a distinctive set of social practice that motivate teachers, making learning accessible, and build an ongoing professional community; and networks that organize and sustain relationships among these communities and produce new and revitalizing forms of support, commitment, and leadership."

Lieberman, A., and Wood, D.R. "The National Writing Project." Educational Leadership, 2002, 59(6), 40-43.

Implementing Standards. As of 2000, 49 states have established academic standards for their schools. Creating high standards, though, is not enough to improve learning in schools.  Successful implementation of standards requires that teachers know how to translate standards through classroom practice that supports a high level of learning.  Many teachers feel they do not.  The National Assessment of Title I found that "in 1988 only 37 percent of teachers in [Title I] schools reported that they felt very well prepared to implement state of district curriculum and performance standards." (Mencken, K. "When All Meets All." NABE News, May-June 2001, pp. 4-7).  In addition, the U.S. Department of Education found in 1998 that 70 percent of teachers in high-poverty schools received fewer than nine hours per year of professional development related to content and performance standards. Thus administrators can play substantial roles in providing resources and professional development that helps teachers get standards "off the page and into the classroom."

National Writing Project and Carl Nagin.  Because Writing Matters: Improving Student Writing in Our Schools.  San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2003: pp. 73-4.

[back to administrators page]




publications || honors & awards || about sawp || leadership team

university of arizona || college of humanities || college of education || department of english || national writing project


Last modified: February 9, 2012
contact webmaster


View stats